Cuidado de enfermería perdido en pacientes hospitalizados. En una institución pública y una privada / Missed nursing care in patient in public and private institution

Objetivo principal: comparar el cuidado de enfermería perdido en pacientes hospitalizados en un hospital público y un privado, así como los factores relacionados. Metodología: estudio descriptivo-transversal comparativo. Se realizó en dos hospitales (público y privado) en San Luis Potosí, México, durante 2013-2014. Se utilizó el instrumento MISSCARE con una confiabilidad Alfa de Cronbach de 0.91. Resultados: El cuidado perdido de enfermería fue mayor en la institución pública (pública M=29.89, DE=5.72; privada M=9.80, DE=12.10). La mayor omisión en el cuidado en ambos hospitales corresponde a intervenciones de cuidado básico (pública M=41.52, DE=12.09; privada M=16.66, DE=18.83); el principal factor que el personal de enfermería relaciona con el cuidado perdido fue recursos humanos de enfermería (pública M=82.46, DE=12.94; privada M=61.21, DE=21.31). Conclusiones: El cuidado de enfermería perdido predominó en la institución pública, en ambas se atribuye principalmente al recurso humano

Objective: To compare nursing care in patients missed in a public and private hospital, as well as related factors. Methods: descriptive, cross-sectional and comparative study in 2 hospitals (public and private) in San Luis Potosi, Mexico, during 2013-2014. The MISSCARE Survey was administered. The content validity by Cronbach´s alpha 0.91. Results: Missed nursing care was higher in the public institution (Public M=29.89, SD=5.72; private M=9.80, SD=12.10). The biggest omission in care in both hospitals corresponds to basic care interventions (Public M=41.52, SD=12.09; private M=16.66, SD=18.83); the main factor that nurses reported was human resources (public M=82.46, SD=12.94; private M=61.21, SD=21.31). Conclusions: The missed nursing care dominated public institution, in both institutions it is mainly attributed to human resources

Factors influencing the missed nursing care in patients from a private hospital.

Objective: to determine the factors that influence the missed nursing care in hospitalized patients. Methods: descriptive correlational study developed at a private hospital in Mexico. To identify the missed nursing care and related factors, the MISSCARE survey was used, which measures the care missed and associated factors. The care missed and the factors were grouped in global and dimension rates. For the analysis, descriptive statistics, Spearman's correlation and simple linear regression were used. Approval for the study was obtained from the ethics committee. Results: the participants were 71 nurses from emergency, intensive care and inpatient services. The global missed care index corresponded to M=7.45 (SD=10.74); the highest missed care index was found in the dimension basic care interventions (M=13.02, SD=17.60). The main factor contributing to the care missed was human resources (M=56.13, SD=21.38). The factors related to the care missed were human resources (rs=0.408, p<0.001) and communication (rs=0.418, p<0.001). Conclusions: the nursing care missed is mainly due to the human resource factor; these study findings will permit the strengthening of nursing care continuity.

Factors influencing the missed nursing care in patients from a private hospital / Fatores que influenciam o cuidado de enfermagem omitido em pacientes de um hospital particular / Factores que influyen en el cuidado de enfermería perdido en pacientes de un hospital privado

ABSTRACT Objective: to determine the factors that influence the missed nursing care in hospitalized patients. Methods: descriptive correlational study developed at a private hospital in Mexico. To identify the missed nursing care and related factors, the MISSCARE survey was used, which measures the care missed and associated factors. The care missed and the factors were grouped in global and dimension rates. For the analysis, descriptive statistics, Spearman's correlation and simple linear regression were used. Approval for the study was obtained from the ethics committee. Results: the participants were 71 nurses from emergency, intensive care and inpatient services. The global missed care index corresponded to M=7.45 (SD=10.74); the highest missed care index was found in the dimension basic care interventions (M=13.02, SD=17.60). The main factor contributing to the care missed was human resources (M=56.13, SD=21.38). The factors related to the care missed were human resources (rs=0.408, p<0.001) and communication (rs=0.418, p<0.001). Conclusions: the nursing care missed is mainly due to the human resource factor; these study findings will permit the strengthening of nursing care continuity.

RESUMO Objetivo: determinar os fatores que influenciam o cuidado de enfermagem omitido em pacientes hospitalizados. Método: estudo descritivo correlacional, desenvolvido em um hospital particular do México. Para identificar o cuidado omitido e fatores relacionados, utilizou-se o instrumento MISSCARE, que mede o cuidado omitido e os fatores associados. O cuidado omitido e os fatores foram agrupados em índices globais e por dimensões. Para fins de análise, foi utilizada estatística descritiva, correlação de Spearman e regressão linear simples. O estudo recebeu aprovação de comité de ética. Resultados: participaram 71 enfermeiras dos serviços de urgências, terapia intensiva e hospitalização. O índice global de cuidado omitido mostrou um coeficiente M=7,45 (DE=10,74); o índice com maior cuidado omitido correspondeu à dimensão de intervenções de cuidado básico (M=13,02, DE=17,60). O principal fator que contribuiu ao cuidado omitido foi o de recursos humanos (M=56,13, DE=21,38). Os fatores relacionados ao cuidado omitido foram os recursos humanos (rs=0,408, p<0,001) e comunicação (rs=0,418, p<0,001). Conclusões: o cuidado omitido de enfermagem atribui-se principalmente ao fator de recursos humanos; com base nos resultados deste estudo pode-se fortalecer a continuidade do cuidado de enfermagem.

RESUMEN Objetivo: determinar los factores que influyen en el cuidado de enfermería perdido en pacientes hospitalizados. Método: estudio descriptivo correlacional, se realizó en un hospital privado de México. Para identificar el cuidado perdido y factores relacionados se utilizó el instrumento MISSCARE que mide el cuidado perdido y los factores asociados. El cuidado perdido y los factores se agruparon en índices globales y por dimensiones. Para el análisis se utilizó estadística descriptiva, correlación de Spearman y regresión lineal simple. El estudio fue aprobado por el comité de ética. Resultados: participaron 71 enfermeras de los servicios de urgencias, terapia intensiva y hospitalización. El índice global de cuidado perdido mostró una M=7,45 (DE=10,74); el índice con mayor cuidado perdido correspondió a la dimensión de intervenciones de cuidado básico (M=13,02, DE=17,60). El principal factor que contribuyó en el cuidado perdido, fue el de recursos humanos (M=56,13, DE=21,38). Los factores relacionados con el cuidado perdido fueron los de recursos humanos (rs=0,408, p<0,001) y comunicación (rs=0,418, p<0,001). Conclusiones: el cuidado perdido de enfermería se atribuye principalmente al factor de recurso humano; los hallazgos de este estudio permitirán fortalecer la continuidad en el cuidado de enfermería.

Estilo de vida y autoestima en personas diabéticas de una comunidad suburbana / Lifestyle and self-esteem in persons with diabetes in a suburban community

Introducción. Los estilos de vida y la autoestima repercuten en las conductas de salud de la persona con Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) para mantener un control. Objetivo: Identificar la relación entre estilo de vida y autoestima de personas DM2. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo-transversal y correlacional en 81 personas de una comunidad suburbana en San Luis Potosí, México. Se incluyeron adultos y adultos mayores, ambos sexos con DM2 que aceptaron participar. Fueron aplicados: a) Instrumento para medir el estilo de vida en diabéticos (IMEVID) con 25 ítems que pondera como favorable, poco favorable y desfavorable); b) Escala de autoestima con 10 ítems (muy de acuerdo a muy en desacuerdo) ponderándose alta, media y baja. El procesamiento y análisis fue en SPSS versión 20, se obtuvo estadística descriptiva y asociación mediante correlación de Pearson. Resultados: La media de edad fue 57.9 años, y predominio femenino. La autoestima alta se encontró en 62.9% y el estilo de vida en 51.7% de poco favorable a desfavorable, estadísticamente no se asociaron como en otros estudios. Conclusiones: Es necesario promover el estilo de vida favorable, y aunque no se asociaron las variables, la autoestima media-alta es una fortaleza para el control de la enfermedad.

Introduction. Lifestyles and self-esteem affect health behaviors of people with Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (DM2) to maintain control. Objective. To identify the relation between lifestyles and the self-esteem, in diabetics type 2. Material and methods: Descriptive- transversal and Correlational study, in 81 persons from a suburban community in San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Adults and seniors, men and women with DM2 who agreed to participate were included. Were applied: a) An instrument for measuring the lifestyle in diabetic (IMEVID) with 25 items that weights be favorable, unfavorable and favorable); b) self-esteem scale with 10 items (strongly agree to strongly disagree) weighted high, medium and low. The processing and analysis was SPSS version 20, descriptive and statistical association was obtained by Pearson correlation. Results: The mean age was 57.9 years, and female predominance. High self-esteem was found in 62.9% and lifestyle 51.7% from unfavorable to favorable, were not associated statistically as in other studies. Conclusions: It is necessary to promote favorable lifestyle, and although the variables were not associated, medium-high self-esteem is a strength to control the disease.